Consensus mediation specialises in commercial mediation

Consensus at Work - options - similar but different

Learn more about us by selecting from the links below...

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQ - Is every dispute suitable for mediation?



No. Where there is a significant imbalance of power between the parties it may be inappropriate to mediate unless the less powerful party has suitable representation.

In cases where any agreement between the parties is one which must be scrutinised by the court, such as those relating to trusts, any agreement reached in mediation will not be binding until ratified by the court.

If the expiry of a limitation period is imminent it may be wise to issue protective proceedings because time continues to run throughout the mediation process. Assuming the dispute is settled in mediation the litigation is disposed of easily, and if not then the claimant has not been prejudiced by the expiry of a limitation period.

If an injunction is required it may be appropriate to seek that injunction in court proceedings, then settle the dispute through mediation rather than continuing the litigation.

If one or both parties want a public hearing then mediation will not be suitable BUT it may be possible to address this by all parties agreeing in advance that the settlement will be publicised afterwards.

Consensus Mediators will not assist parties in any case that involves crime or other illegality (as defined by the laws of England and Wales).




« How does the mediator decide who is right or who wins? What about the cynical party, just out to fact find? How can the 'genuine' other party not be at a disadvantage?»


 

 

Top

Why mediate with Consensus?:

mediation works ...It's often difficult to see what's really going on in a dispute - mediation cuts to the issues

"... because it helps the parties to resolve even the most difficult disputes in a practical way. It deals with their real interests and needs without the risks and costs of further court proceedings. The parties achieve their own solution without an imposed decision."

consensus mediation's role ensures that...

  • Mediators remain wholly impartial and focused on the dispute because we handle all the fee negotiations, contracts and documents;
  • Mediators do not become disqualified from acting (even by perception) because of previous direct or frequent instructions from one party or solicitor;
  • Our experienced case managers can help smooth out pre-mediation communications between representatives in highly charged or multi-party disputes;
  • Clients and their solicitors can concentrate on the case while we sort out all the administration and logistics.

why choose consensus mediation...?

We quote an inclusive fee for the mediator's time and the administration of the entire mediation process. Consensus Mediation does not charge for "overtime" or for any other hidden extras. Consensus Mediation engages the best mediators from all over the country, so we can find the right person in the right place to help resolve your dispute.

Our fee structures are designed to give you clear, attractive, options - call us to find out more

Call our Case Managers:

0844 561 1763

or email: contact@consensus
mediation.co.uk

Search:



Consensus Mediation

82 King Street
Manchester M2 4WQ

Regent's Place
338 Euston Road
London NW1 3BT

 

bro-ker [broh-ker]
a person who functions as an intermediary between two or more parties in negotiating agreements, bargains, or the like.

Origin:
1350–1400; ME broco(u)r < AF broco(u)r, abrocour middleman, wine merchant; cf. OPr abrocador, perh. based on Sp alboroque gift or drink concluding a transaction (< Ar al-burūk the gift, gratuity), with -ador < L -ātōr-